The American Jew
How One Group of Immigrants Changed a
Nation
By Gerard Meister
Prologue:
There was an especially unique aspect to the flood of
millions of immigrants from Eastern Europe – almost all Jewish
– coming to our shores through Castle Garden and Ellis Island
around the turn of the century, and that was the Jewish commitment to
the cause of social justice, particularly as it played out with
respect to civil rights.
While it is true that much has been
written about the struggles of African Americans with their civil
rights and the role (if any) Jews played in that struggle, I believe
that some fresh insights are worthy of a second look, so let us begin
by shedding some light on a most important matter which has, in my
opinion, been given short shrift by historians and social
commentators and that is: the right of a defendant to be tried by a
jury of his peers and the role one lone Jewish immigrant played in
that matter.
First articulated in the magna carta
and then memorialized in the Sixth amendment to our Bill of Rights
(and later to the due process of law in our Fourteenth Amendment)
this right – the right to a trial with a jury of your peers –
has become a central plank in the foundations of liberty among the
English speaking peoples of the world and this singular right was put
to the test in America during the infamous Scottsboro Boys case in
the early-to-mid thirties in Alabama courts.
Segment 1
Reviewing the Scottsboro Boys Case: immigrant Sam
Liebowitz waged and won the battle for justice which lasted over
five years and how that victory wrought a change in the landscape of
American jurisprudence.
Cast of characters in the melee: NAACP and Clarence
Darrow; Earl Browder and the Communist Party; Alabama Judge Horton;
alleged rape victim Ruby Bates and Reverend Harry Emerson Fosdick ;
Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes checks the jury rolls in Alabama.
In 1931, the defendants, nine southern
African American youths, were “hoboeing” along with four
white boys and two white girls (dressed in overalls!) on the Southern
Railroad’s Chattanooga to Memphis freight on March 25, 1931. A
stone throwing fight erupted when a white boy accidentally stepped on
the hand of Haywood Patterson, a black youth hanging onto the side of
a tank car. The heavily outnumbered whites were forced off the train
and a couple of the boys went to the stationmaster in Stevenson and
complained about being assaulted by a gang of blacks. The
stationmaster then wired ahead to Paint Rock, Alabama where a posse
of armed men stopped the train and rounded up every black youth they
could find and questioned the two white girls, Victoria Price and
Ruby Bates who told the posse they had been raped by the black boys.
The nine captured blacks – forever to be known as the
Scottsboro Boys – were tied together with a plow line and
trucked over to a jail in Scottsboro.
Speedily indicted, the boys were
convicted of rape and battery in a series of trials in rural Alabama.
Considered by many to be really nothing more than a legal lynching,
the trials came to the attention of both the NAACP and the American
Communist Party. Initially, the NAACP balked at taking a stand in the
matter for fear that some of the blacks might be guilty, which would
harm that organization’s stance in southern communities. But as
the furor over the trials mounted in the press, and in particular the
New York press, the NAACP reconsidered and retained Clarence Darrow
to defend the Scottsboro Boys as they came to be known
At the same time the American Communist
Party eager to recruit new members brought in its legal arm the
International Labor Defense (ILD) with defense attorney, Joseph
Brodsky to handle the matter. But Brodsky had a better idea and
advised Browder to seek out New York defense attorney Sam Liebowitz
who had an astonishing record: defending seventy-eight capital murder
cases, he got seventy-seven acquittals (!) and one hung jury.
Surprisingly, the
Scottsboro boys opted to go with the ILD rather than the NAACP and
Clarence Darrow. Enter Samuel Liebowitz, a Jewish lawyer from New
York, who was born in Romania in 1893 and brought to America by his
immigrant parents in 1897. Serving pro bono
from 1931 through 1937, his victory in the
case was attained through the Supreme Court decision of 1935 in
Norris v Alabama when
Liebowitz produced jury rolls which included
blacks, but that the rolls – Liebowitz
maintained – were clearly forged. Chief
Justice Charles Evans Hughes then asked if he could prove that and
Liebowitz produced a magnifying glass for Hughes, who inspected the
document and silently passed the magnifying glass and the document to
the next Justice and so on down the line. The Court then held that
the defendants were denied the due process of law and all the guilty
verdicts were set aside. This was the first time that this nefarious,
racist practice was dragged screaming into the sunlight and from that
point on America was the better for it – surely not perfect –
but better for sure.
Epilogue:
Bits and pieces of the case seem to drag on forever, but by January
23, 1989 the last of the Scottsboro boys were dead. And although
Hannah Arendt termed the climate surrounding the trials a “banality
of evil” there were many people both black and white from the
north and the south that stood tall for the cause of justice:
certainly Alabama Judge James Horton, who on June 22, 1933 set aside
the death penalty verdict on Haywood Patterson and ordered a new
trial. Facing political suicide Judge Horton declared, “Let
justice be done, though the heavens may fall.” Judge Horton was
never again elected.
Special kudos go to Ruby Bates who
finally recanted her rape allegations loudly and clearly and took the
shame of it for all the world to know, with a special assist to
Reverend Harry Emerson Fosdick for helping guide her to that mountain
top.
And finally to that uniquely talented,
tenacious bulldog of an attorney Sam Liebowitz, who gets a place of
honor in the Pantheon of immigrants who helped shape our nation.
Segment 2
How Marion Anderson got to sing at the Lincoln Memorial
on Easter Sunday, April 9,1939: research included some newspaper
articles, but in the main talking about impresario Sol Hurok to Max
Meister, 1889-1874, the author’s father who was Hurok’s
kinsman and friend. Further, both Meister and Hurok were (socialist)
lecturers at The Brooklyn Labor Lyceum in the 1920’s.
Additional material was garnered from the author’s sister,
Lillian Pace (nee Meister) 1910-1987, who was Hurok’s private
secretary in the early to mid thirties.
Marian Anderson’s convoluted path
to the Lincoln Memorial began when she signed on with Impresario Sol
Hurok. What with Arturo Toscanini, famed conductor of the “NBC
Symphony of the Air,” declaring that Ms Anderson’s voice
as, “one that comes along once in a hundred years” this
was quite an achievement for Hurok. Hurok who had an uncanny sense of
timing and an appreciation of the value of publicity then signed Ms
Anderson on to do a concert at Constitution Hall, a venue owned by
the DAR (Daughters of the American Revolution). The DAR promptly
cancelled the engagement because Ms Anderson was a Negro and Hurok
was in his element: on the side of righteousness and ready to go on
the attack!
Enter Eleanor Roosevelt, who promptly
resigned from the DAR and had cut her social awareness teeth as a
volunteer social worker at the turn of the century teaching Jewish
children dance and exercise at settlement houses on the Lower East
Side; and where she met my father, helping him in his work with the
children of the Paterson Silk Mill strikers (1913). And twenty-odd
years later as First Lady, she invited Ms Anderson to sing in the
White House.
So we had a “perfect storm”
of activists waiting in the wings when Walter White of the NAACP
bristled at the DAR not allowing a Negro – Marian Anderson –
to perform at Constitution Hall. Hurok pounced (knowing the First
Lady’s make up) calling for the concert to be held at the
Lincoln Memorial and on Easter Sunday. In short order (we can assume
and be one hundred and one per cent certain that Eleanor leaned on
FDR and FDR leaned on the Secretary of the Interior, Harold L. Ickes,
who then gave permission for Ms Anderson to sing on the steps of the
Lincoln Memorial and a unique, but serious quest for racial equality
in America had begun.
A crowd of 75,000 showed up and this
new march towards racial equality in America had taken its first baby
steps. The publicity about the social protest demonstration was world
wide; almost, but not quite equal to the one that came a long on
October 16, 1963, when another great African American, Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. held his million man march putting us yet closer to
his dream of equality for all Americans.
Segment
3
Opponents of Anti Semitism in America
finally get its champion, the Anti Defamation League (ADL) and the
unheralded and unknown to this day, Aaron Sapiro .
In
the years between the first and second World Wars it became almost de
rigueur to be
anti Semitic in America, what with avowed anti Semites Senator Rankin
and Congressman Bilbo (both from Mississippi) stalking the halls of
Congress and Father Coughlin and Gerald L.K. Smith permeating the air
waves and print media. Incredibly, up until 1930, Roget’s
Thesaurus printed the following description of Jews: cunning,
rich, usurer, extortioner heretic!
But the major
player in blaming the Jews for the ills of the world was an iconic
figure in American history, if not the world: Henry Ford, publisher
of The Dearborn Independent a viciously anti Semitic newspaper
published throughout the 1920’s and had a circulation of
700,000 (quite a remarkable figure for that era). The clarion call
against this virulent plague of anti Semitism was first sounded by a
fledgling organization the Anti Defamation League (formed in 1913 by
Sigmund J. Livingston, a German born Jew) when the ADL released its
initial pamphlet “The Poison Pen” in September, 1930,
targeting The Dearborn Independent and the men behind its series of
canards about “The International Jew.”
Moreover this
call was heard and answered by scores of Americans from all walks of
life including President Woodrow Wilson and past Presidents William
Howard Taft and Theodore Roosevelt and included W.E.B. DuBois,
Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan amongst others. A petition
“The Perils of Racial Prejudice” was drawn up calling The
International Jew, “un-American and un-Christian.”
Yet, Ford’s diatribes against the
Jews continued unabated, the problem being that hate speech in
America was not defined or circumscribed in any way. Ergo, he printed
whatever, wherever and whenever he wanted!
However, the
battle against Ford and his anti Semitic ranting was well and truly
joined, almost innocuously, when in 1927 a young Jewish attorney,
Aaron Sapiro, a son of immigrants, sued Henry Ford for defamation and
brought a a million dollar federal libel suit in Detroit against his
newspaper after accusations that Sapiro’s advocacy on behalf of
agricultural cooperatives was nothing more than a conspiracy against
the individualistic spirit of American husbandry by the International
Jew. Enter the prominent constitutional lawyer Louis Marshall who was
also president of the American Jewish Committee and the trial began
producing banner headlines.
Ford,
desperate to avoid the witness stand engineered a mistrial and sent
emissaries to meet with Marshall to mediate the matter. Marshall
wrung an apology out of Ford ( which
Marshall wrote !)
and Ford settled with Sapiro out of court but, not until Sapiro’s
lawyer got on record that Ford
had libeled all
Jews
So the first step –
although a halting one – to define hate speech in American
jurisprudence was taken. In truth, Sapiro was the Jewish David to the
anti Semites’ Goliath, Henry Ford.
The
upshot was that though American law did not acknowledge hate speech
per se, Marshall prevailed on Ford to sign a public statement that
did and
newspaper editors from Maine to California took note. And so did
Ford, who finally ceased his anti Semitic tirades.
Moreover Ford’s children and
grandchildren took note and participated in helping to heal the
wounds caused by their patriarch. In fact, Ford sponsored
“Schindler’s List” on television. And today I drive
a Ford! So the American Dream lives on.
~~~~~~~
from the April 2012 Edition of the Jewish Magazine
Material and Opinions in all Jewish Magazine articles are the sole responsibility of the author; the Jewish Magazine accepts no liability for material used.
|