Boxes
By N. Shuldig
When I was a young boy I
learned the importance of boxes. My mother had boxes for various
types of games and toys. Each type of toy or game had its box. When
I was finished playing I was expected to dutifully put the toys back
into the specific box reserved for that type of toy and not in a
different box.
As I grew I realized the
importance that categorizing boxes had in simplifying my life. I
utilized shoe boxes for storing my bills. The water bills in this
box, the electric bills in another box, the credit card bills in
another box and so on. I also have boxes to store my CD's. In
addition, I have CD albums to store my various types of CD's. I put
music in this album, videos in another album and various programs in
a third album and backups of my important data in a different one;
each one is marked so I can find quickly when I should need to get
the CD that I need.
I also sort my
clothing in my closets: the shirts in one section, the pants in
another, and the socks in another as well as a place for my
underwear. Let us not talk about storing summer clothing in the
winter and winter clothing in the summer. I have my Hebrew books on
these shelves, my professional books on another shelf, my light
reading books on another shelf and my wife's books on a different
shelf.
I believe that most
people sooner or later have realized the importance in life of
sorting objects into categories. It makes it easier to deal with
retrieving them. The only problem is deciding which box to put
different types of items. Sometimes items can be put in one of two
or three boxes.
This is a minor
problem compared to the impact this system can have on life. No, I
am not talking about where to put the bill from the gardener or
where to put the lone CD that cousin Sid sent with family pictures,
a video and a few short mp3's. I am talking about when we begin to
apply 'boxing' to people.
People are more complex
than CD's or socks. People exhibit many facets even in one area. Can
a person be a liberal and not vote for Obama? I am. Can a person be
Jewish and not like gefilte fish? I don't like it.
Most people do not
fit in any 'box', yet we have a tendency to label people and
put them in a 'box' so that it is easier to deal with them.
Are all Blacks muggers or hoodlums who are just looking to start
fights? I have known many who happen to be fine people. Are all
Arabs looking to stab Jews? I have known many fine hospitable Arabs
who were very friendly and kind. Yet we continue to live with the
stereotype meaning we have put people in general 'boxes' so that we
begin to judge all individuals of one group as if they are all the
same. This in spite of the reality that all people in one group
('box') are not necessarily alike, or even more so, are so
dissimilar.
Often, it is the
media that plays on these accepted generalizations and presents
people in light of their group. In many instances the news media may
have a hidden agenda. As an example, look at Ha'aretz, the online
newspaper. For what ever reason, Ha'aretz sees itself as the
vanguard of Jewish liberal values who will quickly point out to us
inequalities in the Israeli-Arab relationship giving the Arab side
more credence than the Israeli side. Ha'aretz will blame the
government for all lackings in making peace with the Arabs, even
though most people have realized that it is the Arabs who are
holding up peace. Time after time, Ha'aretz will try to point out
criminals who are religious but ignore the secular crimes of the
same nature since they feel the need to castigate the religious.
Don't think that it
is only Ha'aretz that is pushing an agenda by trying to put people
and organizations is boxes. Many other newspapers and organizations
do that too including religious newspapers such as Yeted Ne'eman
that sees itself as the vanguard of the religious and decries any
other religious newspaper who claim to represent the large religious
sector.
The reason that this is
done, however, is very beneficial for the organization. Once you
accept the general and apply it to the particular instead of
utilizing individual evaluation you begin to fall prey to the
workings of these various groups who have agendas. The various
organizations want you to adopt not only the points that they
represent that you find positive, but they want you to be a total
supporter of theirs with no distinction between the various points
in their 'platforms' or 'agendas'.
Now we realize that when
we were children, we made a distinction between good and bad. On the
television the good guys wore white hats and the bad guys wore black
hats. The good guys were totally good and the bad guys were totally
bad. But reality is different; good people have also bad character
traits and bad guys can posses some redeeming qualities. As adults
we know this but it requires mature thinking and investigation –
something we do not expect from children. We know that every person
has merit as well as personal lackings. Human beings being human are
subject to err.
The various groups know
that no one takes the time and trouble to think through all the
points that this group or that hold, so they show us only the best
points and slur the opposition with the assumption that we will not
trouble ourselves to think it through.
I am totally
against labeling. I find that all organizations have positive points
and but also have points that I do not share. To be a part of a
group may give a person a base group of friends, but it will also
rob him of his independence as a thinker. Can a secular person enjoy
learning a tractate of Talmud? Most will say that a secular person
is not interested in such activities. But I can not see why not. If
he/she enjoys it, why not. Do only religious perform mitzvot? It
would seem that of course only they would do such things, but I do
not see why some one who is not observant can not do one mitzvah or
another. Are all religious endowed with sterling characters? No,
there are plenty of charlatans, child molesters and more that we
don't want to know about. Do only non religious serve in the Israeli
army? Nope, plenty of religious also serve. But we have been taught
again and again to put people in boxes. It is in the labeling of
these boxes that brings the troubles and dissent between people
The point here is that as
adults we must not get distracted with the claims and agendas of the
various media outlets and organizations who try to label Jews who
live in the territories as “settlers” who are causing
the problems of peace as a very gross example of 'labeling'. It is
important to open your eyes and see the world as it is, that each
person is different and no one has nailed down perfection yet.
Once the concept of
putting people into boxes is overcome and we can judge people as
individuals, then the conflicts between groups will subside and
individuals will be able to live in peace with their neighbors.
~~~~~~~
from the June 2012 Edition of the Jewish Magazine
Material and Opinions in all Jewish Magazine articles are the sole responsibility of the author; the Jewish Magazine accepts no liability for material used.
|