Kaballistic Insights - a Mystical Understanding of the World


   
    November 1998         
Search the Jewish Magazine Site: Google
Kaballistic Insights - a Mystical Understanding of the World

 
 
 
 

Search our Archives:

» Home
» History
» Holidays
» Humor
» Places
» Thought
» Opinion & Society
» Writings
» Customs
» Misc.

KABBALISTIC INSIGHTS

By Yecheskel Gold

One can study Kabbalistic literature for a long time and still not know what really is going on. Resignedly, one might conclude that this world is closed to the uninitiated. Doubtless, this is somewhat true. However, many of the great Kabbalistic masters of the last four or five centuries, like Rabbi Isaac Luria, the Baal Shem Tov, and the Gaon of Vilna, felt that this profound study is meant to be the primary occupation of these latter generations. They encouraged dissemination of Kabbalistic thought, which automatically would make esoteric doctrine the property of the masses.

As in any discipline, some people are more talented than others. Nevertheless, anyone sincerely interested in the subject can come to worthwhile insights if he is patient.

While intelligence is important for dealing with Kabbalistic literature, the main criteria for success are otherwise. According to the Talmud (BB 12), prophecy has been the realm of fools and children since the destruction of the Temple. Maharal explains that this proclivity derives precisely from their lack of intellectual development. An overly developed mind-set desensitizes people to the reality above human rationality. Natural openness to experience is necessary to genuinely find the Godly in one's own life.

Accordingly, the Ramban called Kabbalism "the way of truth". Rather than being an analytical system, it is a subtle description of reality as perceived by a sensitive soul, adding nothing speculative.

This does not mean that intelligent people are less gifted in these areas. The same Talmudic passage states that though prophecy has been lost to the prophets, the wise have retained it. But for Maharal, this wisdom, too, is natural and intuitive, and this insight, a gift from God.

This openness is more than a readiness to experience new things. One must be ruthlessly honest about oneself, how one really feels and thinks, resisting rationalization and illusion. Subjugation to passions and self-interest, obviously, interferes with one's ability to see life clearly.

Few people are perfect in these areas. Accepting that one is imperfect, and exploring how, is an important part of being genuinely honest and humble.

Working in these directions will help anyone come closer to the world of Kabbala. Clearly, study is necessary, too. The terms and concepts seem bizarre and artificial at first, because they are far removed from the rational world view to which we are so accustomed that we are unaware of it.

Besides, ideas are presented fully developed. We feel we have entered a reality quite separate from our own. In part, this is because much of what is exciting in these ideas is perceived only after one has mastered them enough to apply them further. This is what the Kabbalistic books do, mostly.

To a great extent, though, insight into the world of Kabbala comes from garnering many small, clear insights. With patience, the sublime and awesome reality comes into view.

MYSTICAL LIGHT

Zohar means radiance. This name tells us a primary concern of that work, which is the core book of Kabbala. For the uninitiated, too, light has positive connotations. We would rather not be in the dark. But for Kabbalists, the notion of light is very highly developed and quite specific.

Light is different from other forms of existence we know. It is real, but ephemeral. For all practical purposes, it has no weight and no duration. Unlike matter, light always has an identifiable source. Travelling great distances virtually instantaneously, it is barely bound by physicality.

These descriptions are approximate for physical light, which does have a tiny mass and a measurable speed. Material manifestation imposes certain limits on phenomena. Mystical light is spiritual. In fact, it is the spiritual ideal.

Let us examine one aspect of light, its deriving from an identifiable origin. This does not mean only that we know the light has a source, but that it reveals its source. Looking directly at the sun, we actually see only the sun's radiance. Nonetheless, by seeing the sun's light, we are aware of the sun, and not of light as something existing independently. Light is nothing but how the sun is revealed.

This way of being is very pertinent to Kabbalists, because it describes almost exactly the spiritual ideal. One of the principle tenets of mysticism is that God is revealed in the creation. While everything exists in order to show God's greatness, this ideal is not always realized in practice. We mostly experience the mundane, not the divine. This means that God is hidden from us. Unlike light, the material world seems to exist in its own right, not revealing its source. When God is revealed, he is revealed through spiritual light.

There are a number of ways in which God is revealed, and we plan to deal with them in later articles. There are also different levels of revelation, from vague awareness of His being through mention of His name, to overpowering, full blown, mystical experience, and more. The former level is quite minimal, not really divine, whereas the character of the mystical experience is divine.

Usually, people do not have full blown experience of the divine, but most people do have intense religious feelings sometimes. We may use other words to describe our feelings, but a proper explanation should show that these are really experiences of the divine. There are events that inspire us. Although the individual components of the event are banal and physical, the message of what happenned so overwhelms us, that the individual components lose their separate existence and take on a significance beyond their individual identity and character. An inspiring experience evokes something great, eternal, beyond the scope of the material world. Through it, we glimpse, no matter how fleetingly, the divine. Momentarily, the physical creation is transformed, through this experience, into spiritual light; it radiates from its divine source, and God is suddenly revealed.

THE IDEA OF SEPHIROT

The ten sephirot are vessels that God used in creation. For thoughtful people, the idea may seem outrageous. Creation was ex nihilo (from nothing), so where did vessels come from? Also, God's omnipotence, surely, requires no outside help!

Besides, what are these "vessels", anyway? Kabbala compares them to "colored glass through which the light shines". Such imagery is not very helpful unless one experiences it. There must be a way to understand this fundamental concept.

The universe's structure suggests something about how it was made. Behavior is lawful, indicating that principles precede and govern the details of creation. Forming and following principles is called intelligence. There are beneficial and detrimental interactions between creations. In directing the universe, God "relates" to his creatures, analogous to various emotions. Finally, the creation has an inside and an outside; the universe manifests only part of what is potential. There is a purpose of creation, too, not revealed in the physical world. Its reality is "inside". These modes of being, of which our universe has ten, are the sephirot.

Let us replace the word "vessel" with "tool". A tool enables us to do certain jobs, like hammering or holding. It leaves its mark on what it was applied to; hammers drives in nails, while pliars hold things fast. We have mental tools, too. Logic is a different tool from intuition, and yields a different kind of product. Similarly, each part of the creation reflects the particular vessels used to create it.

Humans relate to their surroundings according to various modes. Each is a general approach to things which can produce an array of behaviors. We approach some situations intellectually, others, emotionally. Love is one emotional mode. Fear, beauty, triumph, and gratefulness are other human attitudes.

Behaviors express the modes we adopt. They do not arise independently of a mode. The kindness mode can be expressed in the behavior of giving a gift, aggression, in striking someone. We give the gift to be kind, not just because we want to perform this action. Bestowing a gift or striking someone are comparable, on a molecular level. Their differ on a spiritual plane, in their significance. The meaning of the first act was "kindness", and of the second one, "aggression". These modes exist in a sphere above the physical, only finding expression in the physical.

We infer someone's attitudes from his actions. By analogy, we attribute these sephirot to God based on the form of the universe. For example, we ask Him to treat us mercifully.

Human behavior, and even the various modes of relating, arise from something deeper. Intuition and analysis, love and fear, aesthetics and sincerity, each expresses an aspect of a more profound level of humanity, the soul, which subsumes all of them. Similarly, the course of the universe expresses a deep level of Divinity. This is the Light, radiating through the various colored glasses, the sephirot, each revealing a different aspect of the whole, yet none containing the whole.

THE LUNAR CALENDAR

Sometimes, the Jewish holidays come out early, sometimes late. This is because our calendar follows the moon, not the sun. After waning to nothing, the new crescent moon appears on the first day of the new month. Twelve lunar months make three hundred fifty four days, eleven days short of the solar year. We add an extra month seven years out of every seventeen to compensate, so Passover will always fall in spring.

This seems somewhat incongruous. We would like an exact fit between solar and lunar years, and the divergence seems an imperfection in the universe, a departure from the ideal. It is hard to see a hand of the Creator in this discrepancy.

This topic has wide implications. We expect God's creation to be neat and simple. Seeming flaws, like good suffering while evil prospers, or fossils, challenge our faith.

The problem is that many people's faith is simplistic. Obviously, God did not have to create a simple world. He can make a very complicated one, both physically and morally, like this one. By pondering the complexity of the creation, one gets an inkling of how little we grasp God's greatness.

Still, Torah obliges us to relate to God, and to base moral choices on our comprehension of God and Torah. These being so complex, one understands why religious people spend so much time studying. Torah reveals how all of this complex universe is connected to God.

Reality has two main aspects: 1)Torah, the ideal, moral, or spiritual, and 2)the real, or material world. The mind can grasp ideals. Thinking processes, by nature, generalize and abstract. They operate in a non-material world. Concepts are only in the mind. For example, the category of doors is spiritual; materially, each door is separate from all others. Only the mind links all individual doors through a concept. Similarly, goals and plans are the motivation and basis for our activities. Through them, reality feels worthwhile and has meaning. Reality is always more complicated than we imagined, though, and we must struggle to realize our ideals. This is because our minds idealize matters. The ideal, basic to our functioning, is best revealed in simplicity. Material reality is a different, and usually a more complicated realm.

The discrepancy between solar and lunar years parallels the structure of creation. The sun symbolizes the ideal. Like light from the sun, which reveals and is true to its source, the ideal reveals the Godly in the creation. (See our article on mystical light). The moon represents materiality, which is not like light, not revealing its divine Source. Rather, it gets light from the ideal, the sun. The material world connects to God through the ideal. Through moral choices in the real world, we connect to God. The real world is imperfect, though, not quite fitting the ideal. Thus, it is a struggle to comply with the commandments. Just as the material world tends to diverge from the ideal, and we must correct for the divergence, so the lunar year falls short of the solar one, so one must periodically compensate for the difference.

MAZAL

Mazal tov! The standard Jewish blessing for weddings and other simchas might make us wonder how to reconcile the idea of luck, or even fate, with orthodox beliefs in a world directed by God, where everything has a purpose.

The Talmud (Nedarim) states that "there is no mazal for Israel", but that this applies only when we follow God's will. If so, then saying "mazal tov" implies an insult!

The passage we are discussing relates how God took Abraham outside and showed him the stars. Abram and Sarai were fated to have no children, but now that they are renamed Abraham and Sarah, they will have. We remark that new names merely brought them to a new mazal. Changing mazal is not the same as being totally free of it!

Really, "everything has a mazal, even a Torah scroll in the ark". Some scrolls are used often, others rarely. If our parents somehow "deserved" to get children just like us, we did nothing to get these exact parents, order in the family, place of birth, height, and talents. Matters like these, determined before we have merits, belong to mazal, and greatly influence our identity and the course of our lives.

For Kabbalists, mazal is the spiritual pathway bringing the Divine plan down from the upper worlds, to be realized in the creation. The heart of the Divine plan is the ideal, the true purpose of the whole course of the universe. In order to reveal the Divine plan in the physical world, decisions must be made about the circumstances, time, and locale in which each bit of the "meaning of it all" comes to life.

Such matters may have significance, like banishing Jews from Spain on the fast day of Tish'a b'Av, or concluding the Gulf War on Purim, but they are often arbitrary and inconsequential. A soul, for example, is given the life-mission of dealing (properly) with certain moral issues. These issues have Divine significance, but countless other meaningful possibilities must exist. Why were these issues singled out? Doubtless, many different scenarios could present the same moral problem. Why was this specific context chosen?

The term mazal describes choices we can not understand or predict. Balls landing on a peg have equal chances of falling to right or to left. Statistically, half go to each side, but we can not foretell which way a given ball will go. This uncertainty, a major factor in science, in quantum and particle physics, for example, is regarded as an element of randomness in the universe. Intuitively, though, something must cause the ball to fall the way it does. For Kabbalists, the reason we can not predict each choice is because it is made on a level above causality. God is totally free.

Mazal gives the universe great flexibilty; natural laws are just approximations. We can change our mazal-fate by pleasing God, since He is free. God directs the world as He chooses. The Divine plan can be accomplished in many ways, each greatly meaningful. The choice is not an accident, but we can still wish our dear ones a good mazal.

THE MEANING OF RIGHT AND LEFT

"Rescue Your right hand, and answer me!", we beseech God in the conclusion of every Amida prayer. In blessing Joseph's sons, Jacob placed his right hand on Ephrayim's head, as a mark of special favor. "For Your right hand is extended to accept the penitent". There is a long list of verses and other quotes where the right hand is viewed as the way of dispensing love, kindness and leniency.

The left hand denotes judgment and power. We regard it with fear and dread. As the Talmud sums it up: "The right hand draws people near, and the left hand rejects them."

We may wonder how this imagery came about. For "righties", the left hand seems no stronger, perhaps weaker, than the right. About a quarter of the population is left handed, and we discern no reflection of these distinctions in their character.

The Jewish literature must be looking at things differently. Let us begin by remarking that in Halachic terms, left handed people are often regarded as being different from the others in having their "right" hand on the left side. The left hander puts Tefillin on "his" left hand, which is on the right side. So the expressions, "right" and "left", refer to the more and the less dextrous hands.

Dexterity is identified with the "right" hand, and, hence, with love, kindness and leniency. Power, justice, and fear, then, would be expressions of manual ineptness!

If we think in terms of the experience of right and left, we will be closer to understanding them spiritually. We use our dextrous hand when we need to do something requiring sensitivity. Our "right" hand follows our mental instructions much better than the "left" one, so we employ it for fine detail and close work. It cooperates nicely when we want to do something, mediating comfortably and effectively between our minds and what we're working on.

The left hand is a little clumsy, though, and is best used for keeping something steady while we work on it. If we want it to do something more subtle, we have to force it to obey us, and we have to control it consciously.

We are relaxed with our right hand, but our left hand is rather like a stranger to us, and we can not quite deal with it comfortably.

In like fashion, when we ask God to deal with us with His right hand, we are begging for the sense of rightness, for the closeness and comfort, harmony and peace, associated with His kindness.

Power and control are hallmarks of the left, because that is the only way we can do anything with our clumsy hand. If God's will just does not seem to fit us, and we can not seem to conform to it, then He is automatically dealing with us with His left hand. The demand to conform to a standard is the definition of the attribute of justice.

When we do "measure up" to the attribute of justice, then left is converted to right.

ANTHROPOMORPHIC DESCRIPTIONS OF GOD

"And guard yourselves very well, for you saw no image on the day God spoke to you at Horeb" (Deut. 4,15). This verse embodies Torah's strong opposition to idolatry. Yet we read: "And God created man in His image". Isaiah and Ezekiel had prophetic visions of God sitting on a throne. Anthropomorphic imagery fills both Biblical and Kabbalistic literature.

Moderners relate better to the idea of an unknowable, infinite God, totally without limit or form. Descriptions of "an old man with a white beard" seem primitive, and, being too ubiquitous to be just dismissed, tend to repel us.

Kabbalists, though, find conceptions of God as infinite and unknowable an incomplete view of the reality. God reveals Himself through the finite, too, by creating. When we say nature, we mean God. So, the numerical sum of the letters of His name, Elohim, is eighty six, the same as haTeva, nature.

The universe reveals something about how it was created. There are consistent patterns of physical behavior. Energy is conserved, and actions cause opposite and equal reactions. We infer that laws underlie behavior. Creation is not random; it follows certain principles. Nature behaves intelligently, not randomly. This is not human intelligence, of course. We can not fathom its character or depth. However, it is real.

Distinct entities, like plants, animals and humans, make up the creation. Relations between an entity and the rest of the universe can be either beneficial or detrimental to the entity. Nature is, variously, "kind" or "harsh" to creatures.

For the Talmud (Berachot), these Divine "relations" to creatures are not feelings (see Ramban, Deut. 22, 6). Since the Talmud concludes that there are reasons for the commandments, though, God's actions do reflect kindness and mercy, for Rambam. That is, the commandments are not mere, arbitrary directives we must follow. Divine "kindness" or "justice" motivate them. We can plausably apply this logic to God's direction of creation: He relates to His creatures.

Perhaps the main element of modern religious sentiment is our sense that life has purpose. This notion attributes anthropomorphic features to the Creator, too; He operates on two different levels, an "inner" level of purpose, and an "outer" one of "creation". This perspective is central to our conception of God. Because life has purpose, we must follow the commandments. If the universe has no purpose, it does not matter that one believes, or what one does.

This means that God's direction of the universe is intentional. The consistent, intelligent patterns of creation, and nature's relation to individual creatures, derive from the divine purpose. If not, life has no purpose.

We can not relate to a totally unknowable God. Merely submitting because one fears His power is not genuine religious feeling. Through Kabbalism, we can see and relate to God's ways, even coming to share, somewhat, His perspective. This is true religion.

THE MYSTICAL GROOM AND BRIDE

A story of passionate yearning and love, the "Song of Songs" was almost excluded from the Bible, even though King Solomon was its author. Rabbi Akiva objected, dubbing it a parable of the love between God and Israel, and secured its inclusion. All biblical works are holy, he said, but this one is "holy of holies".

Male and female symbolism abound in Kabbala, denoting a spiritual relationship. In the physical realm, a fetus forms inside the female. Equally the child of the male, its link to the father is less obvious. After developing, it emerges into the world. Similarly, spirituality is seen to originate from a "male" source, but must be received and developed by a "female". The result is that spirituality, whose character is really other-worldly, is expressed in the material world.

For example, a flash of insight originates in a source beyond our ability to grasp or control. That source is "male" to our conscious mind's "female". The insight develops in our mind as we analyze its implications. Finally, conclusions emerge, bringing us to act on our insight. Originating in a spiritual state, the insight has materialized in the form of acts expressing the conclusions that we developed about it.

God is considered the groom of Israel, the bride. They reunite each week, when the spiritual ideal is manifested on earth, in the delight and tranquility of Sabbath on earth.

The groom and bride were married at Mount Sinai. Israel received the Torah, which developed and continues to develop within our people, producing spiritual offspring, the wise and righteous. The words of Torah come to life in a sensitive mind and soul, giving rise to an inspired existence.

The Groom and Bride love each other, and see their own fulfillment through the other. For us earthly beings, life lacks meaning and direction unless we are committed to something higher and more ideal than ourselves. We long to be inspired, and to do something truly worthwhile. Spirituality needs us, too, though. An ideal is finer and more significant when it is realized in practice. Otherwise, it is sterile. The mystical groom and bride need each other.

This is not mere poetic imagery. It accurately describes an important aspect of our reality. A goal, for example, is spiritual; it has not yet been accomplished, after all. If we imagine eliminating all goals, how drab and unenergetic our existence would be! In that case, we would long to be uplifted from the banality of our existence. Looking forward to the future, which does not yet exist, makes life much more pleasant. We need this spirituality!

Some serious thinking will show just how central to our lives are matters that are only spiritual, like goals and ideals, or even the anticipation of pleasure. It is the very source of our motivation to live. Usually, we are too caught up in the events of our lives to recognize this underlying, basic pattern. It is there, though, behind the scenes. This is the inner sanctuary, the holy of holies.

THE BODY LIVES FROM THE SOUL

Man is essentially spiritual. Personality, ideas and emotions are not physical. Losing a limb does not mean losing some of one's identity. Nobody can be described adequately as meat with a certain weight and dimensions.

True, spirituality is unscientific. So is art. Whatever is not objectively measurable is outside the domain of science. They really exist, but not in the realm of science. We need no better proof than our own experience.

For some, the evident has become non-obvious. They demand proof. In fact, the concept of soul exists already in science, with different terminology.

The biochemical definition of life is: a stable, dynamic system maintaining a higher level of enthalpy (organization and energy) than its environs by exchanging material and energy with the outside.

A system is not material. Operating in material, it acquires energy and matter, but the system itself is really a dynamic organization. Matter is not dynamic; its arrangement can be. The organized pattern itself is not the material; it is the way the material is arranged. A system is spiritual.

During a certain time (about seven years for humans), all the material in an organism is exchanged. The carbon, oxygen, and phosphorus atoms are gone, replaced by identical substitutes. The system is essentially the same, yet all of its matter is new. A human, after seven years, retains his identity. This is so because the essence of a living system is not material. It is spiritual, a soul.

A system can take different physical forms. The soul manifested in bodily organization is the same as what was implicit in the undifferentiated embryo's genes. In theory, it could be programmed into a computer, too. Lacking physical life, then, it would be just a potential life. The computer, genes, and the body are just containers for the soul.

A physical lack can interfere with the expression of some part of the system. For the soul, the part continues to exist, but it does not function physically. Damaging an eye impairs sight, but does not reduce the system's potentially having vision. Even if brain lesions affect vision, the system's intrinsic sightedness remains. Therefore, it is profoundly affected by lack of sight. A lack exists only in terms of an ideal state, which is spiritual. Plants are not blind, they are sightless. People are intrinsically sighted. Without vision, they are blind. This potential for vision, like all of the system, is spiritual. Think about it.

There are, then, dynamic spiritual entities capable of material manifestation. We call these entities souls.

When its material no longer allows the system physical expression, the organized matter loses it dynamic quality, and becomes static. The soul has departed the world, returning to a purely spiritual state.

MORALITY AND RITUAL

Torah has been on the defensive through all generations. For idol worshippers, an intangible God seemed ludicrous. Idol worship came out of vogue, but the Temple was destroyed and our exile began. Medieval Jews faced reconciling being the true religion with persecution by other creeds claiming supremacy. As weaknesses in rival beliefs appeared, other challenges arrived. This is all in the grand design.

Confidence that Torah can pass this test is not enough. We must prove our detractors wrong, not simply outlive them.

Modern western man has a moral sense. For many, this has replaced religion as an approach to life. Ethics have become the standard for evaluating religion. Seeing no moral value in, say, waving a lulav, people dismiss ritual as irrelevant.

Ritual is effective in promoting socially desirable activity and eliminating antisocial behavior. Someone lacking moral misgivings can be taught proper conduct as rituals to follow for eternal reward or punishment. This works even in private, when threat of societal punishment is absent, so its social value is immeasurable. However, this seems unnecessary for ethical people. Also, it does not justify waving a lulav.

Kabbala describes two levels of fear of God, lower and higher. We described the first level regarding people lacking moral insight. The second fear is an internal ethical feeling of the importance of God's plan. Thus, people have intrinsic worth, and harming them is wrong. Implicitly, this is awareness of physical actions existing in a moral or spiritual context. Someone with this sense is spiritual; his sense of right and wrong, and feeling of responsibility for others, reveal that intangible, non-material matters are real to him.

For such people, study of Kabbala develops spiritual insight, because they can relate what they learn to personal, inner experience. A broader, truer view of reality develops, and one sees that spirituality is as real as physicality, just different. For example, purpose is spiritual; actions exist in the physical realm, but their purpose exists only for the mind. Life's having purpose is a spiritual insight.

If purpose is real, ritual makes sense. Our problem with ritual is that we see no purpose in it. This is because our standards are materialistic. Materialism is a very limiting, unimaginative outlook. When the purpose of life is our standard, we become spiritual. Clinging to our sense of purpose gives us energy to face life's vicissitudes better. It also provides new perspectives. Ritual expresses a view of our deeds not in terms of how they fit the world, but in terms of what the world is for.

By making rituals obligatory, Torah shows that it sees us in terms of our purpose, insisting that we embrace that outlook, too. This loosens the hold of materialism, so we can develop spiritually. An important moral statement of man's purpose in its own right, ritual also reinforces man's ethical nature by emphasizing his spiritual side. As the Talmud states: Torah was given only to refine man.

HUMANISM AND RELIGION: IN GOD'S IMAGE

We might think that our ancestors exalted God only because they felt so dependent on Him; they pacified Him so it would rain, so they would stay healthy, and for the myriad other matters which they were helpless to affect directly. With greater control over nature, we no longer feel so compelled to exalt God, so our religious side turns automatically turns to humanism, the ideal of humanity. This view does explain why many people turn away from formal religion, but it has two serious faults. It assumes that our religion is not humanistic, and that a focus on God is not humanistic.

This is how they misunderstand the point of Torah: Halacha, imposing a set of rules, does not seem humancentered. It seems bent, instead, on making us accommodate God. This is especially true of the laws called "chukim", which we must follow without understanding. Humanists would prefer more genuine and spontaneous spiritual expression, like art and music, which allow participants more freedom.

Torah views these matters differently. The Talmud asks: "What does it matter to God if we slaughter an animal from the neck or from the throat? Rather, Torah was given only to refine man." Torah is structured like man, with two hundred forty eight positive commandments corresponding to the human limbs, and three hundred sixty five negative commandments, to the veins. This means that Torah was made for man, as we see, simply, from the concerns of Torah: everything about how man lives. Rather than forcing God's way upon man, Torah is how true humanity is God's way. He chose us as the way of fulfilling His purpose for the universe.

Following Torah maximally realizes man's potential. Serious study makes man profound, and following the commandments renders him kind, just, brave, and spiritual. Though most people deviate from the ideal, they usually still are better than they would be if they did not have Torah, and the few who do realize the ideal - the righteous - are a striking example to us of the wisdom of God, because we see in them, palpably, how life is really meant to be lived. They waste no time, and involve themselves with what really ought to be done with life. People can be truly holy, as the verse states: Man was created in God's image.

By making the commandments obligatory, God forces us to operate on a higher level than our natural inclinations. Torah is a moral imperative to realize our human potential, and not to be content with the easy way. It renders the humanist ideal a religious one. Being the best person we can be is the way we come closest to God, and that is God's "concern", too.

Even "chukim", which demand us to subordinate our human perspective to God's, are strongly humanist, religious statements. They elevate us by emphasizing that we are human. This will be the subject of the next article. Briefly, though, by exalting God, we come tangibly, mystically closer to Him. Torah wants us to be Godly.

MYSTICISM AND HUMILITY

Moses, the greatest of prophets, was the humblest of men. This is no accident. God praised Moses about these two traits, and about faithfulness, in the same context (Numbers 12). They must be linked.

In that passage, we learn the difference between Moses' prophecy and that of all other prophets: Moses prophecied in full daytime awareness, while the other prophets were overcome by visions. Moses' normal consciousness could accommodate even a powerful mystical experience. This is because Moses imposed nothing on reality, but took it as it is. We often impose our assumptions on experience, forcing our perceptions to fit our preconceptions. Besides cultural bias, we are motivated by ego to see reality in a certain way. The stark truth is often too disconcerting. When a very powerful experience impinges on us, disrupting our world view, we lose our grasp of reality. This is a vision. But Moses was able to accept everything that God showed him of reality because he was the humblest of men, and able to acknowledge the truth. Humility is realism, and pride is pretension.

It is no wonder we refuse to look at the truth. Most of us have emotions too powerful to express spontaneously without getting into trouble. We are always dissatisfied. All of us are ashamed of certain negative feelings and motivations, and prefer not to deal with these matters.

Moreover, we fake competence. Really, everyone is helpless, but this is an uncomfortable feeling. Awareness of how much we must trust is painful to most people. We must not wallow in self-pity, but deal with reality. Few of us work out their own values. We often base decisions on a false self image because we do not know what we want. We are groping, but rather than facing our uncertainty, we often cover it with a facade of self assurance. Admitting the truth would be giving up our pride. But God is truth, and pretending in this way distances us from the contact with God called realism.

Concomitantly, we lose the ability to see the greatness of God and His creation, being too absorbed in ourselves. We are far from mystical contact.

Torah, too, is truth. Its aim is to make us utterly realistic. Study should not lead only to ideas and knowledge; it should bring insightful realism. This is not mere materialistic pragmatism, of course. Reality is bigger than that.

Commandments help preserve the true shape of reality. We learn that that they are all to be followed as "chukim", regardless of whether we understand the reason for them or not. This should not be covered up with a veneer of selfassurance; the point is that one is supposed not to know why one is doing it. This brings us face to face with reality: that we are groping, that we do not know why we are here and what it is all about, and that we trust in God and hope for the best. This is the most realistic, direct experience of life there is, and it is how we can see God most clearly. If we are genuine, it is close to prophecy.

GOD, MORALITY AND PRACTICALITY

Freedom of choice is one of the biggest intellectual problems for modern man. If we are created and controlled by God (or nature, for those opposed to religious terms), how can we direct our own lives? Some people cop out, denying that we are free, but experience denies this. We even could not decide to act as if we had choice, if we did not have it.

Nor are our choices purely practical. We are more free than just having to decide between ice cream flavors. There is an actual interruption in the flow of causality from God's creating us to our actions, and we have to choose how to direct that energy. For this, we require a set of values, explicit or implicit, to determine what are proper goals.

Freedom gives us access to a spiritual realm. As the biblical serpent said, by eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge, and receiving the ability to choose (see Ramban), we become Godlike, knowing good and bad. Rashi comments that through this, we gained the Godlike ability to create and destroy worlds. These worlds are spiritual realms, born of knowledge and imagination.

Responsibility is a result of having choice. Society may punish criminals simply as a practical way of preventing offences, like it keeps dangerous animals off the streets, but morality and responsibility start when one is free.

Determining what is good and bad is no simple matter. Doing the job properly requires wisdom and careful analysis. Also, we must recognize that we are smaller than the task, and must check our results with others. If we do not take it seriously, we are irresponsible, and that is bad. Nor is the problem limited to what we must do. There are good and bad attitudes, too. Grimness and irresponsibility are examples of bad attitudes that could lead to many bad actions.

This is the function of Torah study. Obviously, everyone can not be a scholar. However, people should have sufficient knowledge of the Law to be on the right track. The Talmud (Maccot) does not exonerate someone who murdered through ignorance that it is forbidden. "He should have learned!", we say, meaning that not learning is morally wrong.

Since we have moral responsibility, we might think that our concerns should be entirely spiritual. We could even think that having a practical attitude might be somewhat sacrilegious. After all, practicality turns its back on moral matters, ignoring the most important issues of life.

In fact, the opposite is true. Practicality is part of morality.The flow of causality from God's will to action is interrupted, so we have moral choice. To limit our concerns to spirituality would be entirely irresponsible. Life is too important for us to rely on its spontaneous development. Someone who does not labor, practically, to improve the world is abdicating his ethical responsibility. If religion is not also practical, it is immoral. True spirituality and morality require deep, practical involvement in life.

~~~~~~~

from theNovember 1998Edition of the Jewish Magazine

Please let us know if you see something unsavory on the Google Ads and we will have them removed. Email us with the offensive URL (www.something.com)




HOME
PAGE
 | 
ABOUT
US
 | 
MAKE
DONATION
 | 
SUBMIT
ARTICLE
 | 
CONTACT
US
 | 
FREE
SUBSCRIPTION
 | 
SEARCH
ARCHIVES